What Contributes to the Success and Failures of Mergers and Acquisitions?
Mergers and Acquitions are happening constantly in the
business world, where currently there are talks between BT and Telefonica, for BT
to buy back O2, which they had owned previously until 2001.
Merger Motives
Each company will have their own reasons for undertaking
M&A activity. According to Arnold, 2012, four classes of merger motives are
identified.
One
example of a successful M&A is the acquisition of
Pixar by Disney in 2006 in a $7.6billion deal. The success of movies
such as
the Toy Story franchise, Cars and Finding Nemo amongst many more is only
a
taste of Disney’s success in their M&A activity. In 2009, Marvel,
one of
the world's most prominent character-based entertainment companies,
agreed a
merger with Disney in a $4.3billion deal. Most recently, in 2012, Disney
have
acquired another franchise ‘Lucasfilm’, the creators of the successful
Star Wars
franchise in a $4.05bn deal. According to Arnold, the success of a
M&A is not guaranteed as soon as the deal is complete, but rather
its what happens after that makes it a success or failure. This is
refered to as post-merger success. Whilst many may think the process of
the M&A is the
difficult part, they can be hugely mistaken. The success of M&A is
what
happens after and ensuring the companies communicate and integrate
effectively
to help this success. According to Stefan Stern from Arnold, 2012, who
was
discussing Proctor & Gamble and Gillette, he says “There are
administrative, logistical and technical challenges. Will new contracts
of
employment be required? Where should the headquarters of the combined
operations be located? How can companies’ information technology systems
be
integrated?” These are all issues and questions that many, if not all
M&A
need to take into consideration post-merger.
Not all M&A are successful like Disney and
their acquisitions, in fac0,t there have been many failures throughout the years, for
example in 2005 eBay announced they were going to buy internet telephony
company Skype for $2.6billion. However, four years down the line and the merger
ended when eBay said they were unloading Skype to a group of private investors
for $1.9billion.
So what actually happened between these companies which
caused this ordeal? Well according to PCWorld, when
eBay bought Skype, it had hoped the VoIP service would improve communications
between its customers. Buyers could talk easily with sellers about items they
were interested in; in turn, sellers could build relationships with customers
via the power of VoIP chats. But the Skype-eBay integration never panned
out. The main reason: For most eBay users, email is good enough. Buyers and sellers
don’t really need a voice call to seal a deal. The eBay-Skype marriage
suffered from other problems too. First, the culture clash between the two
companies was too great to overcome. “eBay is an extremely conservative,
bank-like culture,” says Abramson, a marketing consultant and Internet
telephony guru. “Skype was out to be the democratization of voice. They
were out to be the leveler of the playing field, and they’ve done that.” In
addition, Skype went through several management teams during its four-year eBay
period—a lack of consistency that didn’t help matters at all.
As well as successful and
failed M&A, there are also instances of companies interested in merging
with another company, but for one reason or another, it never happens. One
example of this is the potential M&A between Pfizer and AstraZeneca, where
Pfizer placed a bid of £55 per share (£69billion) to takeover UK based Pharmaceutical
Company AstraZeneca. The reason for the rejection was because Astra believed the
company and their ‘attractive prospects’ they were being undervalued, as Mr Johansson
said "We have attractive growth prospects and a rapidly progressing
pipeline. In the coming months we anticipate positive news flow across our core
therapeutic areas, which underpins our confidence in the long-term prospects of
the business." The full article can be found on the BBC news website.
No comments:
Post a Comment